Wastelinq

Name: Wastelinq
Brand: Wastelinq

Innovative Technology Solutions for the Waste Industry Designed and Built by Waste Industry Experts

Est 2017|Valuation $30.1M|Raised $29.6M|11 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 33K|FTEs 26|HQ Houston, Texas, US

Published Aug 20, 2026

01Common complaints

- You require abundant independent peer reviews to validate product maturity: public review volume is limited. - You require published enterprise security documentation (SAML/SCIM specifics, public security whitepaper, public SOC 2 report): these artifacts are not clearly available publicly. - Your primary need is dispatch and billing for non-hazardous waste hauling: hauling-first products may be a better fit. - You need transparent, self-serve pricing for all modules: pricing is partially published and appears to be quote-based for many enterprise scenarios. - You have highly customized TSDF processing workflows and want minimal change management: implementations in this domain can be complex and buyers should validate configuration boundaries and customization options.

Deal disqualifiers (poor fit)

Organizations seeking primarily lightweight dispatch and invoicing for non-regulated hauling may prefer hauling-first tools
Buyers requiring publicly available, detailed security artifacts (public SOC 2 report, detailed IAM documentation, published SLAs) may face procurement friction unless WasteLinq can provide documentation under NDA

Publicly acknowledged limitations

No clear public vendor roadmap with dated commitments was located in the reviewed sources.

Practical limitations inferred from available information

Limited third-party review coverage makes it difficult to validate reliability, user experience, and support quality externally.
Security documentation gaps: while SOC 2 Type 2 is claimed, detailed enterprise security documentation is not readily available publicly.
Pricing opacity for enterprise/TSDF/broker packages may complicate budgeting and procurement.

02Why they buy

Potential differentiators (supported by sources, with caveats)

- Platform designed to span multiple stakeholder roles across the waste chain (generator → transporter → service provider → disposal facility) rather than focusing on a single stakeholder. - Vendor states the product includes AI-assisted profiling functionality; buyers should validate profiling accuracy and workflow behavior in demos and pilot projects. - The vendor claims SOC 2 Type 2 achievement; buyers should request attestation details under NDA. - The EnviroWare and TerraLink acquisitions expanded WasteLinq's product coverage into established hazardous-waste software suites.

Where competitors may have clearer advantages

More extensive public review footprints and independently documented feature comparisons
Clearer, publicly documented pricing and packaging (varies by competitor)
Broader enterprise ecosystem integrations (e.g., SAP) or specialized hauling/dispatch features (e.g., Linklogiq)

03Field reports

Review platforms (G2 / Capterra / TrustRadius)

- G2: WasteLinq's G2 page indicates there are not enough reviews to provide comprehensive buyer insights. - Capterra: No clear WasteLinq listing or review set was located in the captured results; a similarly named product appears in some search results and should not be conflated with WasteLinq. - TrustRadius: No TrustRadius listing surfaced in the captured results. Bottom line: Independent review coverage is limited compared with many B2B SaaS products.

Vendor-published testimonial (paraphrased)

A vendor-published testimonial describes close vendor support on regulatory matters and assistance with ESG and sustainability-related activities. This testimonial is vendor-provided and not an independent verification of performance.

Community/social proof (availability)

The vendor's LinkedIn company page lists product development and testing claims; these are vendor-controlled channels and were not independently verified.
Public discussion on broader community forums did not surface in the captured results; this absence may reflect limited community penetration or low visibility under the searched keywords.

What customers appear to value (from available evidence)

Based on vendor materials and limited third-party content, reported themes include:

Support for compliance workflows (RCRA/DOT/state)
Digitizing paperwork and reducing duplicate data entry
Providing portals and data visibility across stakeholders

Common criticisms (from available evidence)

Because independent review volume is low and community threads were not located in the reviewed sources, documented criticisms are limited. The limited public feedback could reflect a smaller installed base, low online review participation, or private feedback channels used by enterprise customers. Practical recommendation: request reference calls representing different stakeholder roles (generator, transporter, TSDF), and validate high-risk workflows such as e-Manifest submissions, profile approvals, exception handling, corrections, and reporting during demos.

Availability of case studies

No detailed, independently-audited WasteLinq case studies with quantified metrics were identified in the reviewed sources.

Vendor-published outcomes (limited)

- The vendor states it offers AI-driven profiling features and e-Manifest submission capabilities and references SOC 2 compliance. Critical evaluation: - These statements are vendor-authored and lack published methodologies, baselines, or third-party validation. - Buyers should request measurable before/after metrics for ROI claims, including profiling approval cycle times, manifest error rates, audit findings reductions, and labor hours saved with the vendor's calculation methods.

04Best fit

Best-fit company sizes

Generators: from small facilities (the vendor offers a free generator version) to multi-site industrial organizations
Transporters / service providers: small-to-mid operators standardizing documentation, as well as brokers requiring multi-location and portal capabilities
TSDFs: facilities managing regulated waste intake, approvals, inventory, lab analysis integration, and barcode tracking

Strong-fit industries

Industrial manufacturing
Energy and chemicals
Environmental services companies
Any regulated-waste generator with RCRA compliance responsibilities

Key roles/personas

EHS Manager / Environmental Compliance Manager
ESG/Sustainability Manager
Transportation/dispatch manager (hazardous waste transporter)
TSDF operations manager and lab manager
Compliance/audit stakeholders

Qualification criteria (good fit)

High volume of waste profiles and manifests with frequent approvals
Multiple handoffs between generator, broker, transporter, and TSDF
Need for audit trails and standardized documentation
Willingness to engage in implementation and process standardization

05The pitch

What the product does (objective value proposition)

WasteLinq is a cloud-based waste management and compliance platform focused on regulated (notably hazardous) waste workflows across the waste chain (generators → transporters → service providers/brokers → disposal facilities/TSDFs). The product is described by the vendor as intended to reduce manual paperwork, standardize data formats, and provide visibility for profiling, manifesting, routing/dispatch, reporting, and audit-ready recordkeeping. The vendor states the platform includes automation and AI-assisted features for waste profiling, and provides integrations intended to reduce manual reconciliation between systems and downstream facilities.

Target market and market positioning

WasteLinq targets the following segments: - Waste generators (EHS/ESG teams managing RCRA-regulated waste) - Hazardous waste transporters (documentation and shipment tracking) - Waste service providers/brokers (order management, portals, compliance, cost transparency) - Disposal facilities / TSDFs (intake, profile approvals, inventory/processing visibility) The vendor positions the product as an integrated platform for compliance and logistics, particularly for organizations using spreadsheets, legacy desktop tools, and disconnected vendor portals.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Wastelinq including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →

Published Aug 20, 2026

01Common complaints

You require abundant independent peer reviews to validate product maturity: public review volume is limited.
You require published enterprise security documentation (SAML/SCIM specifics, public security whitepaper, public SOC 2 report): these artifacts are not clearly available publicly.
Your primary need is dispatch and billing for non-hazardous waste hauling: hauling-first products may be a better fit.
You need transparent, self-serve pricing for all modules: pricing is partially published and appears to be quote-based for many enterprise scenarios.
You have highly customized TSDF processing workflows and want minimal change management: implementations in this domain can be complex and buyers should validate configuration boundaries and customization options.

Deal disqualifiers (poor fit)

Organizations seeking primarily lightweight dispatch and invoicing for non-regulated hauling may prefer hauling-first tools
Buyers requiring publicly available, detailed security artifacts (public SOC 2 report, detailed IAM documentation, published SLAs) may face procurement friction unless WasteLinq can provide documentation under NDA

Publicly acknowledged limitations

No clear public vendor roadmap with dated commitments was located in the reviewed sources.

Practical limitations inferred from available information

Limited third-party review coverage makes it difficult to validate reliability, user experience, and support quality externally.
Security documentation gaps: while SOC 2 Type 2 is claimed, detailed enterprise security documentation is not readily available publicly.
Pricing opacity for enterprise/TSDF/broker packages may complicate budgeting and procurement.

02Why they buy

Potential differentiators (supported by sources, with caveats)

Platform designed to span multiple stakeholder roles across the waste chain (generator → transporter → service provider → disposal facility) rather than focusing on a single stakeholder.
Vendor states the product includes AI-assisted profiling functionality; buyers should validate profiling accuracy and workflow behavior in demos and pilot projects.
The vendor claims SOC 2 Type 2 achievement; buyers should request attestation details under NDA.
The EnviroWare and TerraLink acquisitions expanded WasteLinq's product coverage into established hazardous-waste software suites.

Where competitors may have clearer advantages

More extensive public review footprints and independently documented feature comparisons
Clearer, publicly documented pricing and packaging (varies by competitor)
Broader enterprise ecosystem integrations (e.g., SAP) or specialized hauling/dispatch features (e.g., Linklogiq)

03Field reports

Review platforms (G2 / Capterra / TrustRadius)

G2: WasteLinq's G2 page indicates there are not enough reviews to provide comprehensive buyer insights.
Capterra: No clear WasteLinq listing or review set was located in the captured results; a similarly named product appears in some search results and should not be conflated with WasteLinq.
TrustRadius: No TrustRadius listing surfaced in the captured results.

Bottom line: Independent review coverage is limited compared with many B2B SaaS products.

Vendor-published testimonial (paraphrased)

A vendor-published testimonial describes close vendor support on regulatory matters and assistance with ESG and sustainability-related activities. This testimonial is vendor-provided and not an independent verification of performance.

Community/social proof (availability)

The vendor's LinkedIn company page lists product development and testing claims; these are vendor-controlled channels and were not independently verified.
Public discussion on broader community forums did not surface in the captured results; this absence may reflect limited community penetration or low visibility under the searched keywords.

What customers appear to value (from available evidence)

Based on vendor materials and limited third-party content, reported themes include:

Support for compliance workflows (RCRA/DOT/state)
Digitizing paperwork and reducing duplicate data entry
Providing portals and data visibility across stakeholders

Common criticisms (from available evidence)

Practical recommendation: request reference calls representing different stakeholder roles (generator, transporter, TSDF), and validate high-risk workflows such as e-Manifest submissions, profile approvals, exception handling, corrections, and reporting during demos.

Availability of case studies

No detailed, independently-audited WasteLinq case studies with quantified metrics were identified in the reviewed sources.

Vendor-published outcomes (limited)

The vendor states it offers AI-driven profiling features and e-Manifest submission capabilities and references SOC 2 compliance.

Critical evaluation:

These statements are vendor-authored and lack published methodologies, baselines, or third-party validation.
Buyers should request measurable before/after metrics for ROI claims, including profiling approval cycle times, manifest error rates, audit findings reductions, and labor hours saved with the vendor's calculation methods.

04Best fit

Best-fit company sizes

Generators: from small facilities (the vendor offers a free generator version) to multi-site industrial organizations
Transporters / service providers: small-to-mid operators standardizing documentation, as well as brokers requiring multi-location and portal capabilities
TSDFs: facilities managing regulated waste intake, approvals, inventory, lab analysis integration, and barcode tracking

Strong-fit industries

Industrial manufacturing
Energy and chemicals
Environmental services companies
Any regulated-waste generator with RCRA compliance responsibilities

Key roles/personas

EHS Manager / Environmental Compliance Manager
ESG/Sustainability Manager
Transportation/dispatch manager (hazardous waste transporter)
TSDF operations manager and lab manager
Compliance/audit stakeholders

Qualification criteria (good fit)

High volume of waste profiles and manifests with frequent approvals
Multiple handoffs between generator, broker, transporter, and TSDF
Need for audit trails and standardized documentation
Willingness to engage in implementation and process standardization

05The pitch

What the product does (objective value proposition)

The vendor states the platform includes automation and AI-assisted features for waste profiling, and provides integrations intended to reduce manual reconciliation between systems and downstream facilities.

Target market and market positioning

WasteLinq targets the following segments:

Waste generators (EHS/ESG teams managing RCRA-regulated waste)
Hazardous waste transporters (documentation and shipment tracking)
Waste service providers/brokers (order management, portals, compliance, cost transparency)
Disposal facilities / TSDFs (intake, profile approvals, inventory/processing visibility)

The vendor positions the product as an integrated platform for compliance and logistics, particularly for organizations using spreadsheets, legacy desktop tools, and disconnected vendor portals.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Wastelinq including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →