Wastelinq

Name: Wastelinq
Brand: Wastelinq

Innovative Technology Solutions for the Waste Industry Designed and Built by Waste Industry Experts

Est 2017|Valuation $30.1M|Raised $29.6M|11 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 33K|FTEs 26|HQ Houston, Texas, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- WasteLinq vs hauling/dispatch tools (e.g., Linklogiq): WasteLinq focuses on compliance, profiling, and manifest workflows across stakeholders, while hauling tools often prioritize dispatch optimization, billing, and driver apps. - WasteLinq vs enterprise EHS (e.g., SAP EHS): SAP offers broader enterprise EHS functionality and integration with SAP ecosystems, which may be more suitable for large enterprises but may be heavier than specialized waste-chain coordination tools. - WasteLinq vs Wastebits: Wastebits provides sales/lead generation and insight tools; the offering is not a direct operational compliance platform comparable in scope to WasteLinq's end-to-end compliance claims.

Market adoption signals

Company database entries and press coverage indicate the vendor is active and has received external funding; these signals are not direct measures of customer adoption or product maturity.
Social follower counts are a weak proxy for adoption and should be considered alongside customer references and usage metrics.

	WasteLinq	Resourcify	Linklogiq
Starting Price	Published transporter-package pricing for a packaged offering; setup fees are presented for packaged offerings	Pricing presented as monthly cost plus per-pickup cost in quoted packages	No public list price on homepage snippet; appears quote-based or subscription-based
Typical Use Cases	Regulated waste chain workflows (generator → transporter → TSDF), hazardous waste emphasis	Waste and recycling operations, circularity programs (EU focus)	Haulers needing dispatching, invoicing, asset tracking, driver workflows
Key Strengths	Compliance-focused workflows across stakeholders; vendor references SOC 2 compliance; acquisitions expand product coverage	Focus on waste/recycling operations and sustainability reporting; structured modules	Operational hauling features (auto-dispatch, route optimization, payments/invoicing, asset tracking)
Key Weaknesses	Limited independent reviews; public documentation gaps for enterprise security controls and SLAs	Less clearly positioned specifically for US RCRA hazardous waste chain end-to-end	Less focused on hazardous waste compliance specifics; pricing transparency limited

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

WasteLinq vs hauling/dispatch tools (e.g., Linklogiq): WasteLinq focuses on compliance, profiling, and manifest workflows across stakeholders, while hauling tools often prioritize dispatch optimization, billing, and driver apps.
WasteLinq vs enterprise EHS (e.g., SAP EHS): SAP offers broader enterprise EHS functionality and integration with SAP ecosystems, which may be more suitable for large enterprises but may be heavier than specialized waste-chain coordination tools.
WasteLinq vs Wastebits: Wastebits provides sales/lead generation and insight tools; the offering is not a direct operational compliance platform comparable in scope to WasteLinq's end-to-end compliance claims.

Market adoption signals

Company database entries and press coverage indicate the vendor is active and has received external funding; these signals are not direct measures of customer adoption or product maturity.
Social follower counts are a weak proxy for adoption and should be considered alongside customer references and usage metrics.

	WasteLinq	Resourcify	Linklogiq
Starting Price	Published transporter-package pricing for a packaged offering; setup fees are presented for packaged offerings	Pricing presented as monthly cost plus per-pickup cost in quoted packages	No public list price on homepage snippet; appears quote-based or subscription-based
Typical Use Cases	Regulated waste chain workflows (generator → transporter → TSDF), hazardous waste emphasis	Waste and recycling operations, circularity programs (EU focus)	Haulers needing dispatching, invoicing, asset tracking, driver workflows
Key Strengths	Compliance-focused workflows across stakeholders; vendor references SOC 2 compliance; acquisitions expand product coverage	Focus on waste/recycling operations and sustainability reporting; structured modules	Operational hauling features (auto-dispatch, route optimization, payments/invoicing, asset tracking)
Key Weaknesses	Limited independent reviews; public documentation gaps for enterprise security controls and SLAs	Less clearly positioned specifically for US RCRA hazardous waste chain end-to-end	Less focused on hazardous waste compliance specifics; pricing transparency limited

Wastelinq

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Market adoption signals

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Market adoption signals

02Market Map